Appeals Court Hears Case on Texas Funding Ban of Planned Parenthood

7
  • Planned Parenthood
    (Photo: AP Images / Charles Krupa)
    This file image shows the Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts headquarters on Commonwealth Avenue in Boston.
By Michael Gryboski, Christian Post Reporter
June 8, 2012|5:41 pm

An appeals court heard arguments in a case brought by the State of Texas to lift an injunction against a state law that bars Planned Parenthood from receiving funds through a taxpayer-financed government program.

The Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's office told the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday that a federal judge's injunction against the ban on Planned Parenthood funding was based on bad legal reasoning.

"Plaintiffs' response is centered on the mistaken belief that Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991), gives health-service providers a constitutional right to administer a social-welfare program on the State's behalf – even when the entity actively promotes elective abortions and utilizes a trademark associated with the promotion and performance of elective abortion," read the appeal brought by Abbott.

"Plaintiffs incorrectly claim that '40 years of unbroken case law' establishes that States may not withhold taxpayer subsidies on account of the recipient's exercise of constitutionally protected rights, when the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld laws that condition government benefits on the recipient's agreement to refrain from constitutionally protected speech activity."

In July 2011, Texas Governor Rick Perry signed into law Senate Bill 7, which prevented abortion providers from receiving funds from the state's Woman's Health Program.

"The department shall ensure that money spent … is not used to perform or promote elective abortions, or to contract with entities that perform or promote elective abortions or affiliate with entities that perform or promote elective abortions," read the provision.

Follow us

The provision stirred controversy at the state and federal level, as Planned Parenthood chapters in Texas protested the effort.

"Last year, Governor Perry and the Texas Legislature shamefully politicized women's health and cut state family planning programs by two-thirds leaving more than 360,000 women without access to basic, lifesaving care," read a "Take Action Now" alert on Planned Parenthood's website.

"Yet Texas is committed to violating federal law and restricting the right of Medicaid patients to choose their own provider."

In March, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced it would cut federal funding to Texas' WHP due to their refusal to give funds to Planned Parenthood. In response, Texas filed suit against the federal government over the announcement.

By April, Planned Parenthood sued the State of Texas over the WHP provision with the hopes of overturning the law. They also filed for an injunction against the provision being implemented, which U.S. District Court Judge Lee Yeakel granted.

A day later, a Fifth Circuit judge granted Texas a stay on the injunction, only to have that stay vacated by a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit.

While the Fifth Circuit Court heard arguments from both sides on Thursday, it did not indicate when it would reach a decision on lifting the injunction.

Advertisement
Top Stories

Freed Persecuted Christian Meriam Ibrahim All Smiles, Husband in Tears Amid Warm Welcome by Sudanese Community in New Hampshire (Photos)

Meriam Ibrahim, the Sudanese Orthodox Christian who was nearly executed for her faith, was all smiles and her husband, Daniel Wani in tears, when they and their two young children finally arrived home Thursday night — in ...

Faith-Based Groups Crucial to Overseas Aid, Experts Say

Faith-based communities are a critical part of ...

NYT Reporter: Traditional Marriage Supporters 'Unworthy of Respect,' Deserve Incivility, Marriage Is Whatever Gov't Says It Is

Civil discourse has long been regarded as a necessary component of a well-functioning democracy. But a New York Times reporter believes that value should be abandoned in relations with those who disagree with him on the issue of ...